This contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not ed, have become featured article or featured list candidates, or did not follow the "How to use this " principles in some way.
If one of your requests has been moved here by mistake, please accept our apologies and undo the archiving edit to the peer review for the article. This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I want to get suggestions on how to upgrade this article to Featured article-level quality. I don't believe that any one section needs more attention than any other, so opinions on everything are welcome.
That's all I gots. I've heavily reworked this article for some days now. I will continue working on it, but I would like somebody else's opinion, especially on its contents. Is this article missing anything? Is it featuring something too much? Is the article neutral? Does it give an adequate overview? I've listed this article for peer review because… have expanded the whole article recently and planning to take it for GA level. I'll add sources to all which are not referenced. All suggestions are welcome.
Thank You. Sorry for keeping this PR for so long, I've been online but couldn't find time to do any serious wiki-activity. Two more issues have popped up:. I formally conclude this PR here, I think its ready for a GAR in addition to me being a little strict on the sourcing. It doesn't matter whether your GOCE request gets answered or not since the GA criteria is lenient on the prose quality.
Winston-salem looking fwb want sex date
I'll continue to watch this and follow the GA review when it happens. Ask if you have any further questions. If you can find good images, then better Not a problem if any section doesn't contain one.
And, I'll make those changes which I mentioned. I've listed this article for peer review because I just created it all of itand I'd like to get someone else's opinion on it. Originally, I was just going to research the Christian interpretation of it and add it to the main article on the Ecloguesbut eventually it grew so large that I decided to make it its own article. Some of the sourcing was rather complex and a little bit arcane to read and comprehend, so I'd really appreciate someone checking on what I've written and seeing if I've done the source material justice I'd be more than willing to provide the original texts if anyone needs them; all of them can be found on Google Books, through JSTOR, or a simple Google search.
I'm not too concerned about any sourcing issues in the Christian interpretation section, since the source I used for that section was fairly easy to follow. I'm more concerned with the "Synopsis", "Meaning", and "Textual Criticism" sections. Thanks, Gen. Quick comment - the Rose citation is incorrect, what is the correct publication?
Nikkimaria talk15 August UTC. I want this article to reach a GA class. Any help on how to do this would be appreciated. I can't complain about my own article not getting reviewed while I haven't the others, so here you go.
Tezero talk21 August UTC. I've listed this article for peer review because why not. It's going to take a long time for this article to upgrade from stub class but if you put the effort into it, I can see this as a start-class quality article. I should be very glad of any comments to help me improve the article further and to decide whether it has GA or FA potential or neither.
Tim riley talk28 August UTC. On the whole, good, although not FAC stuff quite yet. I went ahead and fixed some ref formatting issues and left some hidden comments about others I wasn't sure of. I'm sure after the usual suspects have had a pick and a ponder, this will be the usual winning Riley stuff!
More to come Cassianto talk28 August UTC. Up to here, sorry for the intermittency. The others have beaten me to it. I see no other issues Tim, great work as usual. Cassianto talk1 September UTC. Very nicely done. I could not help thinking about Chincoteague I've wandered around England quite a bit in my time, and spent a few hours here once. I remember very little about it, though.
Need cock winston-salem north carolina nsa sex
Still, I shall make a point of looking around more comprehensively should fate place me back in the area. Only a very few comments. Overall I think this looks very good—perhaps not ready for FA yet, but I think a GA nomination would be successful with very little trouble. The article is enjoyable, thorough and informative and I enjoyed reading it.
I hope these thoughts help. Cheers, and keep well. Perhaps mention some of the notable landmarks like the museum in the lead?
Blofeld29 August UTC. Will continue later. I've added a list of listed buildings. You might want to mention the Grade I listed Greta House, now part of the school and give some architectural details from the listed site. I know you mention it already in the notables section. Blofeld31 August UTC.
Very slim pickings from me: a couple of minor tweaks undertaken earlier : feel free to revert anything you don't like. As to the rest….
Choose a location
All ship-shape and riley-fashion apart from those two really inificant questions. Pip pip! That is my lot. Aside from my light reservations expressed above, I found this at least as informative as the "Let's move to A little further attention should see it safely into FAC territory.
Brianboulton talk1 September UTC. Warmest thanks to everyone who has contributed. The article is so much better now than when I put it up for review. Tim riley talk6 September UTC. I've listed this article for peer review because I worked on it years ago, and have returned because I would love for this to be a good, or even featured, article.
I have steadily been working on it for the last week or so, and I would like a second set of eyes to see where the more glaring areas in need of improvedment are. This isn't nearly as bad as I was expecting. From a quick look, the basic information seems to all be there, sources are all formatted alright though some links are dead and I can't speak to the reliability of them alland as a whole the looks nice enough aesthetically.
I would suggest that you find sources for the uncorroborated statements everything with a citation needed tag and all paragraphs that don't end with a citation and seeing if you can expand on his "Minimalist style" and, to a lesser extent, acclaim as a musician.
I mean, this guy is being ranked as one of the greatest guitarists of the 21st century I remember being shocked that he'd made it into It Might Get Loud with the Edge and Jimmybut few others wereand my impression is that he's highly esteemed as a catalyst of the garage rock revival it's basically him, the Strokes, and maybe the Libertines who started it all and of minimalist music in general.
I'm sure there's more out there that this could include in that vein.
Good work so far, though. Oh, and if you're a White Stripes fan, can you point out to me how the Elephant cover is supposed to look like an elephant? I've repeatedly stared at it intently over years and years and I don't see it.
I've listed this article for Peer Review as I've had a good shot at writing it, structuring it and including citations. In order to progress the article further to "Good Article" status, expert advice, external reviews, cooperation and assistance are all required. I would be grateful for any help I can receive in improving this. This article is pretty short I've listed this article for peer review because when I nominated it for GA, one reader who did not initiate review; he only gave it a quick read-over said it was far too long and "overly detailed," without giving any specific reasons for his assessment.
Other readers disagreed, and I just wanted to get a consensus opinion on it. I'm open to any reasonable opinions or suggestions for improvement! This is probably in excess of what's the minimal acceptable standard in a few places, but I think it's worth trying to get the best article possible, and part of that is good images.